Weesenstein dating love romance professional dating site
That being the case, I'm not so amazed about the copy and paste.In fact, something like that almost rates a yawn, except for the editor it happens to.— Maile (talk) , 18 September 2015 (UTC) I'm sorry, but I see nothing in WP: USER to support OID's view, or apparently yours, that it's just fine to move somebody else's user content to mainspace without consultation - quite the opposite.~ Ah, I was responding to Maile who indicated the *original* move was a page move (rather than fixing the issue). Only in death does duty end (talk) , 18 September 2015 (UTC) And so you are correct, Grapple X and ONUnicorn.I was confused by the edit history that only shows edits by June Gloom07 and the admin who did the move.List of tallest buildings in Minneapolis#Timeline of tallest buildings appears to match the source, indicating Menage's building was the tallest at the time but not the first tall building.Is this an issue with varying definitions over time for the term skyscraper or am I missing something?In fact, I would describe such an action as not only not supported by the guideline, but extraordinarily ill-mannered, as well as being contrary to the project's convention of collegiality. Gatoclass (talk) , 18 September 2015 (UTC) Just to clarify: I dont think it is particularly collegial to *move* someone elses draft from userspace to main without consultation, however it isnt against policy and since attribution is kept there isnt a policy (or CC-violating) reason not to, and no real response other than to not worry about it and deal with it.
Only in death does duty end (talk) , 18 September 2015 (UTC) The policy at play here is Wikipedia: Copyrights.
Gatoclass (talk) , 20 September 2015 (UTC) In less than two hours Did you know will need to be updated, however the next queue either has no hooks or has not been approved by an administrator.
It would be much appreciated if an administrator would take the time to ensure that DYK is updated on time by following these instructions: As I write this, there are about 6 hours before the next Queue needs to be ready for the Main page. Giving ample time here so we don't miss the next update.
Only in death does duty end (talk) , 18 September 2015 (UTC) You are correct that it isn't technically against policy, but it flies in the face of WP: NOBAN and other aspects of WP: UP#OWN.
I'm not sure it would be possible, or even desirable, to outright ban such page moves given the licencing conditions, but certainly one should consult with users regarding content in their own user space, and respect their desires concerning it, unless there is very good reason not to, such as when they are employing user pages to retain problematic content that would be unlikely to survive in mainspace. — Maile (talk) , 18 September 2015 (UTC) I'm not clear if you were asking if it will continue to be eligible for DYK beyond the normal seven days because it was moved to mainspace without your agreement?
Search for weesenstein dating love:
While a person posting any text to Wikipedia is at the same time agreeing to license that text under a set of free licenses, the terms of those licenses must still be respected by anyone wishing to reuse the text. What happened was someone did a copy paste of the article from June Gloom07's draft to mainspace.